Looking at https://spdx.org/licenses/ it differentiates between name and id. Here, we abuse our name as id. I consider this to be logically wrong.

We have text:

Using an https://spdx.org/licenses/}SPDX identifier as the license name is recommended.

So how should be ...

I merged similar in ASF parent pom 😄

Looking at https://spdx.org/licenses/ it differentiates between name and id. Here, we abuse our name as id. I consider this to be logically wrong.

We have text:

Using an https://spdx.org/licenses/}SPDX identifier as the license name is recommended.

So how should be ...

I merged similar in ASF parent pom 😄

I know that we have it and only because we don't have an id element. For me, it feels wrong, honestly, but I won't object to merge it.

For me id is more useful than an arbitrary label. Therefore I think we should stick to using an id in the name element (although the naming of the element is unfortunate)

For me id is more useful than an arbitrary label. Therefore I think we should stick to using an id in the name element (although the naming of the element is unfortunate)

Real men don't wear clothes with labels, they have custom-tailored.

Resolve #1095